Getting to know Kokkola Sports Park alliance, Team Sisärata (‘Team inside lane’) — Pauli Koivisto from UKI Architects

16.9.2022

Pauli Koi­visto joined UKI Arc­hi­tects in 1989. Since then, he has specia­lised in desig­ning hos­pi­tals and in refur­bish­ment pro­jects. Pauli has also been involved in the deve­lop­ment of VALO™, the ground-brea­king and user-oriented vir­tual design method.

Pauli says that the Kok­kola Sports Park pro­ject is chal­len­ging in terms of its arc­hi­tec­tural design, yet it also has many inte­res­ting aspects. The pro­ject covers both new builds and the reno­va­tion of old buil­dings, and the park’s arc­hi­tec­tural design caters for several dif­fe­rent user groups, each of which, of course, has its own par­ticular requi­re­ments. 

What expe­rience do you have of wor­king with alliances?

I’m involved in the Poh­jan­kar­tano alliance, which is an example of a very inte­res­ting pro­ject. It’s a deman­ding ove­rall reno­va­tion of a school buil­ding. Just like the Kok­kola Sports Park complex, it also had several dif­fe­rent users and user groups, all of which needed to be given careful con­si­de­ra­tion, and that pro­ject was also divided into sub­pro­jects. The work began in 2015 and will be completed this year as planned. The Tays Heart Hos­pital of Tam­pere Uni­ver­sity Hos­pital was another chal­len­ging and inte­res­ting pro­ject. I was the arc­hi­tec­tural designer in charge and deputy to the chief designer.

Many larger pro­jects have been executed accor­ding to the alliance principle, and various con­struc­tion and design pro­jects, for example, apply this alliance model quite clo­sely. We work with several other cont­rac­tors as a team. I think this way of wor­king is here to stay, and I strongly believe that the number of col­la­bo­ra­tive pro­jects will inc­rease dra­ma­tically in the future. 

How is the coo­pe­ra­tion within the alliance going?

This has got off to a very good start. We actually started wor­king together at the com­pe­ti­tion phase because, even at that stage, we had to think very care­fully about what to do and how to do it. The bid­ding phase was quite a heavy process, really. You don’t get anyw­here now with refe­rences alone; every offer needs to be meticu­lously con­si­dered, which requires a huge amount of effort. You have to take com­pe­ti­tions seriously: if you go for it, you have to put your heart and soul into it right from the start. The pres­sure is also con­si­de­rable, of course, because if you lose the com­pe­ti­tion, the disap­point­ment after all those hours of hard work is huge.

Our coo­pe­ra­tion has been great from the very begin­ning. Eve­ryone is engaged; we bounce ideas off each other and discuss various options from dif­fe­rent pers­pec­tives. What makes things run smoothly is that we have already worked on joint pro­jects with some of the part­ners, and it helps a lot that we all know a little about the way the others ope­rate. Trust has been built during the pre­vious pro­jects. For example, Kari Rin­ta­mäki (from Gran­lund Poh­janmaa Oy) was involved in the Y‑talo pro­ject in Sei­nä­joki, and I’ve worked with Markku Savela (from Ram­boll Fin­land Oy) at the Frami research centre at Sei­nä­joki Uni­ver­sity of Applied Sciences. Col­la­bo­ra­tion between arc­hi­tects’ offices is based on the idea of wor­king as one, and the coo­pe­ra­tion between Uki and Jääs­ke­läinen has got off to a great start.

How have the dif­fe­rent user groups been taken into account in the design?

Timo (Sivula, Mana­ging Director of Kok­kola Sports Park) has pro­vided us with a huge amount of infor­ma­tion about the dif­fe­rent user groups’ expec­ta­tions. He’s been busy visi­ting orga­ni­sa­tions such as sports clubs, event agencies, cul­tural bodies and other sta­ke­hol­ders. His notes have given us a good idea of people’s needs and wishes. And there are lots of them!

It’s impor­tant to col­la­bo­rate with the various users to get the arc­hi­tec­tural design right. I’ve worked with end-users on several pro­jects in envi­ron­ments such as hos­pi­tals. We use the so-called CAVE system (ed. note: VALO™ vir­tual design method), which allows us to pro­ject model spaces on a wall. End-users enter a space wea­ring 3D glasses, and they can already assess its func­tio­na­lity at the design stage: what the space really looks like and what kind of func­tio­na­li­ties it offers.

When we design hos­pital envi­ron­ments, we invite doc­tors, nurses, clea­ners and admi­ni­stra­tive staff to the site. They get to explore the space and can offer us inva­luable feed­back. We’ve found this to work very well. For example, we had given the recep­tion area a lot of thought in one of our pro­jects and taken into account all the feed­back and wishes from the staff. Our design met all their requi­re­ments. But during the vir­tual tour, the recep­tio­nist said imme­dia­tely that it wouldn’t work. This prompted us to discuss the problems and the required changes to the design.

Finally, what do you do in your free time to relax?

I enjoy lis­te­ning to music and going to gigs.

Luitko jo nämä?